As Mark Twain once noted, prophecy is always difficult, particularly
with regards to the future. However, as soon as
Saddam was toppled (He really wasn't but more on that later), one of the first tasks of the America-backed regime
was to restore the US dollar as the nation's oil currency.
YOU'LL BE SHOCKED TO KNOW HOW THE WORLD REALLY WORKS, WHO'S BEHIND IT AND HOW THE BUSH'S ARE INVOLVED:
SOLDIERS ARE NOT FIGHTING FOR YOUR FREEDOMS!!!!!
WARS ARE PROFITABLE AND THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT:
The fact that George Bush lied about the entire Iraq invasion should be of no surprise. Bush and the Bush family are nothing but despicable war criminals:
SO WHY LIE ABOUT IRAN? IT SHOULD BE PAINFULLY OBVIOUS:
WHAT ELSE ARE THEY HIDING?
In November 2000, Iraq began selling its oil for euros, moving away from the post-World War II standard of the US dollar as the currency of
--
international trade.
Whilst seen by many at the time as a bizarre act of
political defiance, it has proved beneficial for Iraq, with the euro
gaining almost 25% against the dollar during 2001.
It now costs around
USD $1.05 to buy one Euro.
Iraq's move towards the euro is indicative of a growing trend. Iran has
already converted the majority of its central bank reserve funds to the
euro, and has hinted at adopting the euro for all oil sales.
On December
7th, 2002, the third member of the axis of evil, North Korea, officially
dropped the dollar and began using euros for trade. Venezuela, not a
member of the axis of evil yet, but a large oil producer nonetheless, is
also considering a switch to the euro.
More importantly, at its April
14th, 2002 meeting in Spain, OPEC expressed an interest in leaving the
dollar in favor of the euro.
If OPEC were to switch to the euro as the standard for oil transactions,
it would have serious ramifications for the US economy. Oil-consuming
economies would have to flush the dollars out of their central bank
holdings and convert them to euros.
Some economists estimate that with
the market flooded, the US dollar could drop up to 40% in value. As the
currency falls, there would be a monetary evacuation by foreign
investors abandoning the US stock markets and dollar-denominated assets.
Imported products would cost Americans a lot more, and the trade deficit
would be magnified.
It is foreign demand for the US dollar that funds the US federal budget
deficits. Foreign investors flush with dollars typically look to US
treasury securities as a means of secure investment. With a large
reduction in such investment, the country could potentially go into
default.
Things could turn very bad, very quickly.
--
We want to thank Whatreallyhappened for much of the below commentary:
In May 2004 an additional 10 member nations will join the European
Union. At that point, the EU will represent an oil consumer 33% larger
than the United States. In order to mitigate currency risks, the
Europeans will increasingly pressure OPEC to trade in euros, and with
the EU at that stage buying over half of OPEC oil production, such a
change seems likely.
This is a scenario that America cannot afford to see eventuate. The US
will go to any length to fend off an attempt by OPEC to dump greenbacks
as its reserve currency.
Attacking Iraq and installing a client regime
in Baghdad may have a preventative effect. It will certainly ensure that
Iraq returns to using dollars and provide a violent example to any other
nation in the region contemplating a migration to the euro.
We have decided to publish articles that tell the truth from several different sources to make sure that you, our loyal readers understand what the REAL truth is behind this bogus war in Iraq and who it benefits. We want to make sure that you understand:
THIS WAR IS NOT ABOUT DEFENDING AMERICA'S FREEDOMS!!!
The soldiers are NOT fighting for your freedoms...They are not fighting for your rights...unknown and hidden from them granted..but they are puppets that have been lied to just like you and I and are actually laying down their lives as well as the lives of innocent Iraqi men, women and children for the greedy profits of this worlds illuminati bankers!!!
An American-backed junta in Iraq would also enable the US to smash
OPEC's hold over oil prices. The US or its client regime could increase
Iraqi oil production to levels well beyond OPEC quotas, driving prices
down worldwide and weakening the economies of the oil producing nations,
thus lessening their likelihood of abandoning the dollar.
It would have
the short term effect of reducing the profits of domestic oil companies,
but the long term effect of securing America's economic hegemony.
The frequently offered canard of the Left that this war is being fought
to secure oil revenues for American oil companies may have some truth to
it.
However, a more plausible explanation may be that the Bush
administration is waging war to protect the dollar and smash the OPEC
hold over international oil prices. It's a war whose purpose is bigger
than Halliburton or Exxon: it's a war being fought to maintain America's
position in the world.
Attending the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, George Bush Senior told the
world that, "the American way of life is not negotiable". As cruise
missiles rain on Iraq, we are learning just how 'non-negotiable' that
way of life really is.
The image to the left is of a piece of Trinitite. This is desert sand that was underneath the explosion of the world's first Atomic bomb in New Mexico as part of project TRINITY, hence the name Trinitite. The heat from that blast melted the sand into a green glass, not unlike the Fulgurites that result when lightning hits sandy soil.
Now, imagine an entire nation looking like the above sample, melted into green glass. Buried in the green glass are the charred remains of the people of that nation. It's not an idle fantasy.
The US spent $5 trillion dollars (back in the 1950s, when a trillion dollars was REALLY a lot of money!) building a nuclear deterrent capability that can actually do that; melt any nation and it's people into a giant slab of green glass.
The USSR knew it, the world knows it, Saddam knew it. The government of Iran knows it.
Even if Iraq had possessed weapons of mass destruction (which we now know they did not), and even if Iraq had the long range ICBMs to reach across the Atlantic with (which we know they did not), Iraq would still not have been a threat to the US because any attack with a weapon of mass destruction would be national suicide.
Those that insist that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were a threat that justified invasion are in essence claiming that the US Government took $5 trillion of your money (over $17,000 from each of you alive today) in a gigantic swindle, because the $5 trillion nuclear deterrent isn't a deterrent after all, that it doesn't work, that nobody is really afraid of it, because they all know it was just a hoax to soak the American taxpayer for another several thousand dollars. Was it all a hoax,
Mr. Bush? Did the American people foot a $5 trillion bill in 1950s dollars for a deterrent system that isn't really a deterrent?
Either the deterrent works or it does not.
If it doesn't, then the American taxpayers have been defrauded on a grand scale.
But if the nuclear deterrent does work, then Iraq can have all the weapons of mass destruction they want, they just won't dare use them. Maybe they can put them in a museum or something.
But they won't dare use them against the United States because they don't want to end up like that piece of green glass at the top of this article.
There is no need to invade over the issue of weapons of mass destruction. There never was.
--
Of course, the issue has shifted. The UN inspectors have found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction.
They
found some documents ABOUT weapons of mass destruction, but documents are not a weapon of mass destruction (with the sole exception of the 1040 form). The UN inspectors found a bunch of old empty artillery warheads from 1988, but empty warheads are not a weapon of mass destruction, and tests show that these empties were never weapons.
--
Soil samples have tested negative for chemicals or radioactivity indicating weapons development. Iraq has allowed the inspectors to pretty much go everywhere they want without hindrance, even into Saddam's home. Imagine the KGB demanding and getting permission to peek into every closet and drawer in the White House and you will get an idea of just how much Iraq is cooperating. The CIA gave the UN inspectors a list of sites they were convinced had weapons of mass destruction. Nothing.
But Bush still got his
invasion, and grabbed the oil wells.
Now the target has shifted to Iran. And once again, we are being warned that Iran, while it does not actually have nuclear weapons, might be close to building one, and this justifies another invasion.
The theory is that if Iran has a nuclear power station, they will build bombs with it. Iran hasn't planned to build bombs with it, and invites inspections (and now tourists) to prove that they are not making bombs, but the theory is that Iran will make bombs with their reactor and fool the inspectors, because, well, to be blunt about it, that's what Israel did at Dimona while they clandestinely built the world's 6th largest nuclear arsenal.
Iran says they don't want a bomb. Personally, after Iraq proved to the world what the US does to oil-rich nations that do not have weapons of mass destruction I would rethink that position.
But if Iran builds a bomb, so what? Maybe they can put it in a museum, or march it down the streets of Tehran in a parade like the Soviets used to do. But they won't use it against the United States. They won't dare.
--
Even if Iran has a weapon of mass destruction (which we know they do not), and even if Iran has long range ICBMs to reach across the Atlantic with (which we know they do not), Iran would still not be a threat to the US because any attack with a weapon of mass destruction would be national suicide.
You see, leaders of nations have huge egos.
They are driven by that dream that future generations will admire their faces on statues and stamps and money. and that doesn't happen if you let your nation get destroyed.
Simply having a nuclear weapon does not mean the nation that owns it will use it. Many nations possess nuclear weapons.
And contrary to all the dire warnings the historical truth is that one and only one country has actually used nuclear weapons against the citizens of another nation and that country is the United States of America.
For all the talk about the threat from Iraq and now the threat from Iran, it is the USA which remains the only country to have actually used a nuclear weapon.
If Iran were to have a weapon of mass destruction and use it against the US, the US could just stand back and turn the entire nation into green glass just like that at the top of this article.
That's what we all paid that $5 trillion for. And unless the US Government wants to admit that $5 trillion nuclear deterrent is a hoax, then we should use it as it was intended to be used, to deter an attack without having to invade a foreign attacker.
*****It is inescapable historical reality that leaders of nations will lie to their people to trick them into wars they otherwise would have refused. It is not "conspiracy theory" to suggest that leaders of nations lie to trick their people into wars. It is undeniable fact.*****
--
This brings us to the present case.
Did the government of the United States lie to the American people, more to the point, did President Bush and his Neocon associates lie to Congress, to initiate a war of conquest in Iraq?
This question has been given currency by a memo leaked from inside the British Government which clearly indicates a decision to go to war followed by the "fixing" of information around that policy. This is, as they say, a smoking gun.
Look at the photo below where Donald Rumsfeld shakes the hand of Saddam Hussein. The United States actually put him in power in the first place!
But the fact is that long before this memo surfaced, it had become obvious that the US Government, aided by that of Great Britain, was lying to create the public support for a war in Iraq.
First off is Tony Blair's "Dodgy Dossier", a document released by the Prime Minister that made many of the claims used to support the push for war. The dossier soon collapsed when it was revealed that much of it had been plagiarized from a student thesis paper that was 12 years old!
The contents of the dossier, however much they seemed to create a good case for invasion, were obsolete and outdated. This use of material that could not possibly be relevant at the time is clear proof of a deliberate attempt to deceive.
Then there was the claim about the "Mobile biological weapons laboratories". Proffered in the absence of any real laboratories in the wake of the invasion, photos of these trailers were shown on all the US Mainstream Media, with the claim they while seeming to lack anything suggesting biological processing, these were part of a much larger assembly of multiple trailers that churned out biological weapons of mass destruction.
The chief proponent of this hoax was Colin Powell, who presented illustrations such as this one to the United Nations on February 5th, 2003.
This claim fell apart when it was revealed that these trailers were nothing more than hydrogen gas generators used to inflate weather balloons.
This fact was already known to both the US and UK, as a British company manufactured the units and sold them to Iraq.
Click for full sized image:
Colin Powell's speech to the UN was itself one misstatement after another. Powell claimed that Iraq had purchased special aluminum tubes whose only possible use was in uranium enrichment centrifuges. Both CIA and Powell's own State Department confirmed that the tubes were parts for missiles Saddam was legally allowed to have.
Following the invasion, no centrifuges, aluminum or otherwise were found.
Powell also claimed to the United Nations that the photo (ABOVE) showed "Decontamination Vehicles". But when United Nations inspectors visited the site after the invasion, they located the vehicles and discovered they were just firefighting equipment. Powell claimed the Iraqis had illegal rockets and launchers hidden in the palm trees of Western Iraq.
None were ever found. Powell claimed that the Iraqis had 8,500 liters (2245 gallons) of Anthrax.
None was ever found.
Powell claimed that Iraq had four tons of VX nerve gas. The UN had already confirmed that it was destroyed.
The only VX ever found were samples the US had left as "standards" for testing. When the UN suspected that the US samples had been used to contaminate Iraqi warheads, the US moved quickly to destroy the samples before comparison tests could be carried out.
Powell claimed that Iraq was building long-range remote drones specifically designed to carry biological weapons. The only drones found were short-range reconnaissance drones.
Powell claimed that Iraq had an aggregate of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical and biological warfare agents.
Powell gave no basis for that claim at all, and a DIA report issued the same time directly contradicted the claim.
No biological or chemical weapons were found in Iraq following the invasion.
Powell claimed that "unnamed sources" confirmed that Saddam had authorized his field commanders to use biological weapons.
No such weapons were ever used by the Iraqis to defend against the invasion and, of course, none were ever found in Iraq.
Powell claimed that 122mm warheads found by the UN inspectors were chemical weapons. The warheads were empty, and showed no signs of ever having contained chemical weapons.
Powell claimed that Iraq had a secret force of illegal long-range Scud missiles. None were ever found.
Powell claimed to have an audio tape proving that Saddam was supporting Osama Bin Laden.
But independent translation of the tape revealed Osama's wish for Saddam's death.
Colin Powell's UN debacle also included spy photos taken from high flying aircraft and spacecraft.
On the photos were circles and arrows and labels pointing to various fuzzy white blobs and identifying them as laboratories and storage areas for Saddam's massive weapons of mass destruction program. Nothing in the photos actually suggested what the blob shapes were and during inspections which followed the invasion, all of them turned out to be rather benign.
In at least one case, the satellite Powell claimed had taken one of the pictures had actually been out of operation at the time.
And many questioned why Powell was showing black and white photos when the satellites in use at the time over Iraq took color images.
Another piece of evidence consists of documents which President Bush referenced as in his 2003 State of the Union Speech.
According to Bush, these documents proved that Iraq was buying tons of uranium oxide, called "Yellow Cake" from Niger.
Since Israel had bombed Iraq's nuclear power plant years before, it was claimed that the only reason Saddam would have for buying uranium oxide was to build bombs.
This hoax fell apart fast when it was pointed out that Iraq has a great deal of uranium ore inside their own borders and no need to import any from Niger or anywhere else.
The I.A.E.A. then blew the cover off the fraud by announcing that the documents Bush had used were not only forgeries, but too obvious to believe that anyone in the Bush administration did not know they were forgeries!
The forged documents were reported as being "discovered" in Italy by SISMI, the Italian Security Service. Shortly before the "discovery" the head of SISMI had been paid a visit by Michael Ledeen, Manucher Ghorbanifar, and two officials from OSP, one of whom was Larry Franklin, the Israeli spy operating inside the OSP.
In July, 2005, the Italian Parliament concluded their own investigation and named four men as suspects in the creation of the forged documents. Michael Ledeen, Dewey Clarridge, Ahmed Chalabi and Francis Brookes.
This report has been included in Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation into the outing of Valerie Plame, and Paul McNulty, the prosecutor of the AIPAC spy case.
A recently declassified memo proves that the State Department reported the fact that the Niger documents were forgeries to the CIA 11 days before President Bush made the claim about the Niger uranium based on those documents.
In the end, the real proof that we were lied to about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction is that no weapons of mass destruction were ever found.
That means that every single piece of paper that purported to prove that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was by default a fraud, a hoax, and a lie.
There could be no evidence that supported the claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction because Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.
In a way, the existence of any faked documents about Iraq's WMDs is actually an admission of guilt. If one is taking the time to create fake documents, the implication is that the faker is already aware that there are no genuine documents.
What the US Government had, ALL that they had, were copied student papers, forged "Yellow Cake" documents, inflated balloons posing as bio weapons labs, and photos with misleading labels on them.
And somewhere along the line, someone decided to put those misleading labels on those photos, to pretend that balloon inflators are portable bio weapons labs, and to pass off stolen student papers as contemporary analysis.
--
And THAT shows an intention to deceive.
Lawyers call this "Mens Rea", which means "Guilty Mind". TV lawyer shows call it "Malice aforethought". This means that not only did the Bush Administration lie to the people and to the US Congress, but knew they were doing something illegal at the time that they did it.
All the talk about "Intelligence failure" is just another lie. There was no failure. Indeed the Army agents who erroneously claimed that missile tubes were parts for a uranium centrifuge received bonuses, while the Pentagon smeared Hans Blix, and John Bolton orchestrated the firing of Jose Bustani, the director of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, because Bustani was trying to send chemical weapons inspectors to Baghdad.
The President of the United States and his Neocon associates lied to the people of the United States to send them off on a war of conquest.
Defenders of the government will point to the cases listed at the top of the page as proof that lying to the people is a normal part of the leader's job and we should all get used to it. And because "Everybody does it" that we should not single out the present administration. But this is madness.
We do not catch all the murderers, yet when we catch a murderer, we deal with them as harshly as possible, in order to deter more murderers.
Right now, we have the criminals at hand and while other leaders in history have lied to start wars, for the first time in history, the lie stands exposed while the war started with the lies still rages on, to the death and detriment of our young men and women in uniform.
We cannot in good moral conscience ignore this lie, this crime, lest we encourage future leaders to continue to lie to us to send our kids off to pointless wars.
Lying to start a war is more than an impeachable offense; it the highest possible crime a government can commit against their own people.
Lying to start a war is not only misappropriation of the nation's military and the nation's money under false pretenses, but it is outright murder committed on a massive scale.
Lying to start a war is a betrayal of the trust each and every person who serves in the military places in their civilian leadership. By lying to start a war, the Bush administration has told the military fatalities and their families that they have no right to know why they were sent to their deaths. It's none of their business.
Our nation is founded on the principle of rule with the consent of the governed. Because We The People do not consent to be lied to, a government that lies rules without the consent of the governed, and ruling without the consent of the governed is slavery.
You should be more than angry. You should be in a rage. You should be in a rage no less than that of the families of those young men and women who have been killed and maimed in this war started with a lie.
You need to be in a rage and you need to act on that rage because even as I type these words, the same government that lied about Iraq's nuclear weapons is telling the exact same lies about Iran's nuclear capabilities.
The writing is on the wall; having gotten away with lying to start the war in Iraq, the US Government will lie to start a war in Iran, and after that another, and after that another, and another and another and another because as long as you remain silent, and as long as you remain inactive, the liars have no reason to stop.
As long as you remain inactive, the liars have no reason to stop.
--
None.
--
FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH CAUGHT IN A BOLD FACED LIE:
Bush Flatly Declares No Connection Between
Saddam and al Qaeda
From the press conference, 31 Jan 2003 During one of his rare press conferences, Former President Bush admitted something which completely contradicts what we've been hearing from him, most other politicians, and the mainstream media.
Not surprisingly, the media have completely ignored this; I couldn't find a single article that mentions it in any news source, domestic or foreign.
- The occasion was a press conference with UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, which took place in the White House on 31 January 2003. Here's the key portion:
--
[Adam Boulton, Sky News (London):] One question for you both.
Do you believe that there is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct link, and the men who attacked on September the 11th?
--
THE PRESIDENT:
I can't make that claim.
THE PRIME MINISTER:
That answers your question.
Under any circumstances, these answers are remarkable for their brevity and directness.
No politician answers clearly and in just one sentence. Yet on this crucial matter, Bush and Blair did just that. (True, Blair then launched into his standard speech about how we need to attack Iraq anyway, but his direct answer is brief and to the point.)
What they unambiguously admitted is that there is no connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden/al Qaeda. You may recall that bin Laden and al Qaeda are officially blamed for hatching, plotting, and carrying out the 9/11 attacks. That's who the British reporter was referring to.
Now the President and Prime Minister have said there is no link between them and the government of Iraq. Could it be any simpler?
WHAT WAS THE REAL REASON FOR THE WAR? OIL!!!!!! CASE CLOSED!!!!
--
Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil
George Wright
Wednesday June 4, 2003
Oil was the main reason for military action against Iraq, a leading White House hawk has claimed, confirming the worst fears of those opposed to the US-led war.
The US deputy defense secretary, Paul Wolfowitz - who has already undermined Tony Blair's position over weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by describing them as a "bureaucratic" excuse for war - has now gone further by claiming the real motive was that Iraq is "swimming" in oil.
The latest comments were made by Mr Wolfowitz in an address to delegates at an Asian security summit in Singapore at the weekend, and reported today by German newspapers Der Tagesspiegel and Die Welt.
Asked why a nuclear power such as North Korea was being treated differently from Iraq, where hardly any weapons of mass destruction had been found, the deputy defense minister said: "Let's look at it simply. The most important difference between North Korea and Iraq is that economically, we just had no choice in Iraq. The country swims on a sea of oil."
Mr Wolfowitz went on to tell journalists at the conference that the US was set on a path of negotiation to help defuse tensions between North Korea and its neighbors - in contrast to the more belligerent attitude the Bush administration displayed in its dealings with Iraq.
His latest comments follow his widely reported statement from an interview in Vanity Fair last month, in which he said that "for reasons that have a lot to do with the US government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on: weapons of mass destruction."
Prior to that, his boss, defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, had already undermined the British government's position by saying Saddam Hussein may have destroyed his banned weapons before the war.
--
Mr Wolfowitz's frank assessment of the importance of oil could not come at a worse time for the US and UK governments, which are both facing fierce criticism at home and abroad over allegations that they exaggerated the threat posed by Saddam Hussein in order to justify the war.
Amid growing calls from all parties for a public inquiry, the foreign affairs select committee announced last night it would investigate claims that the UK government misled the country over its evidence of Iraq's WMD.
The move is a major setback for Tony Blair, who had hoped to contain any inquiry within the intelligence and security committee, which meets in secret and reports to the prime minister.
In the US, the failure to find solid proof of chemical, biological and nuclear arms in Iraq has raised similar concerns over Mr Bush's justification for the war and prompted calls for congressional investigations.
Mr Wolfowitz is viewed as one of the most hawkish members of the Bush administration. The 57-year old expert in international relations was a strong advocate of military action against Afghanistan and Iraq.
Following the September 11 terror attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Mr Wolfowitz pledged that the US would pursue terrorists and "end" states' harboring or sponsoring of militants.
Prior to his appointment to the Bush cabinet in February 2001, Mr Wolfowitz was dean and professor of international relations at the Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), of the Johns Hopkins University.
CASE CLOSED!! THE IRAQ WAR WAS/IS BASED ON A LIE! IF YOU CAN'T SEE THAT NOW, IT'S BECAUSE YOU CHOOSE NOT TO SEE IT.
Why is this all so important now that we have a new President?
Why isn't Barack Obama prosecuting the Bush crime family for war crimes? Can anyone give us one good reason on God's green Earth why we are still in Iraq killing innocent people?
To date 1.3 million Iraqi's have been murdered....half of them 12 years old and younger. We'll tell you why. Because ultimately Obama is controlled by the same illuminati handlers that George W. Bush was and Colin Powell was..
He doesn't have the power to prosecute Bush for his crimes because George Bush wasn't acting on his own while he was in charge. Quite frankly, Bush was too stupid to initiate anything on his own. Bush took orders, he didn't give orders.
Barack Obama is a puppet President just like Bush was. Obama promises "Change" but will it happen? Maybe, but only as far as the Power elite allow him to implement it.
If you think it's not important, let is leave you with a picture of what one United States cluster bomb did to some innocent Iraqi children.
What if these little ones were YOUR children? Would you then finally be outraged? (BELOW).
OKAY, LET'S SWITCH GEARS A LITTLE BIT AND TALK ABOUT SATAN BEING THE "PRINCE OF THE POWER OF THE AIR" OR THE "god" OF THIS WORLD'S "BEAST" SYSTEM.
BUT WHAT ABOUT HITLER?
h1. Lots of times when talking about who is going to be saved and who will not be, I hear professing Christians say "What about Hitler?" Like somehow he's the worst of the worst.
Well, let me point out that even though Hitler was an evil scumbag, U.S. Presidents have killed more innocent people since WW II than even Hitler.
And on top of that, if you rush to the polls to vote for these people, how do you think you don't have blood on your hands?
Remember at the Great White Throne judgements in Matthew 7:22? (Which is a metaphor not a literal event that has happened), Who was God judging? Not the unsaved, not the rebellious, not any of his so called enemies. Who was he judging? The Religious people who think they are righteous!
Here's the point. Yes, Hitler was a God hating degenerate murderous evil psychopath. But, what makes people think U.S. Presidents are any better?
And to take it further if you vote for any of these people, what excuse do you have? Just like the passage in Matthew, God holds the "Holier Than Thou" Religious people who think they are the self righteous, to the same standard and if you partner up with these Presidents who are killing innocent people abroad, how is that different? Right? If they have killed as many people as Hitler, why are they different? If you support them what does that say about you?
Killing innocent people is killing innocent people. What makes this different?
h1. **But that aside for now I want to point out why Jesus does not want us involved in things of the World like "voting" because you come into agreement with the evil Satanists who control this World's system. If you partner up with these evil people by voting, then you put yourself in the same category as them. So when people ask "What about Hitler?"
They might want to ask themselves why they think they themselves won't be the people in the metaphor of Mathew 7:22.**
(Why do we say Matthew 7:22 is a metaphor?
Because it's impossible for it to be a literal account because the judgments haven't taken place yet). And even when they do, God does not, I repeat does NOT sentence people to an eternal torment is some hell fire.
You can read more about that here:
WHAT REALLY HAPPENS WHEN YOU VOTE AND HOW DOES THAT PROPAGATE THE BEAST SYSTEM?
ALWAYS REMEMBER: BOTH PARTIES ARE CONTROLLED. BOTH PARTIES ARE CORRUPT. BOTH ARE DESIGNED TO IMPLODE IN THE END.
BOTH ARE DESIGNED TO TAKE DOWN AMERICA AND MOVE IT INTO THE NEW WORLD ORDER!
If elections really mattered and made a difference for the people, they wouldn't let you do it. Now, on to what the Globalists have planned.
WHEN YOU VOTE YOU UNKNOWINGLY GIVE YOUR POWER TO THE "BEAST SYSTEM"
Before we get started, let's dispel a popular myth. That is if you "exercise your right to vote, that will insure your rights and freedoms. That's about as wrong as it can be. Remember, the World doesn't work the way most people think it does.
Have you ever wondered why there are so many "GET OUT AND VOTE" campaigns? That's all you hear every year about this time. If you don't vote, you are almost shamed...right?
Why do you think that is? Why would the politicians, who are all in it together, be concerned if you vote or not? Voting does NOT preserve your rights.
You already have "inalienable" rights given to you by your Creator. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights is also what is supposed to preserve your rights an an American.
So why is the popular theme to get out and vote?
We'll tell you why. Because when you vote, you actually give away your authority and your rights to the evil and corrupt politicians you are voting for!
Think about it! You really know nothing about these people running for office other than what they tell you on TV. That's right, when you vote, the person you cast your ballot for is under no obligation to do whats in your best interest.
What you have done is given them the authority to the Beast system to do what THEY want to do and not what YOU want them to do!
You voluntarily give up your personal sovereignty and authority to someone who as far as you know could be a pedophile and abuser and believe us, most of them are.
You have said that you no longer are under your own power and authority when you "vote" but have surrendered it to that man or woman who you cast your vote for.
You have in a sense given that person the right and authority to rule over you!
Politicians today are just modern day Sadducees and Pharisees who Yeshua (Jesus) called "Snakes, hypocrites and broods of vipers". The same concept is true today.
When you vote, you essentially give up your rights and freedoms and put it in the hands of someone else. That's right!
THE REASON THE POLITICIANS ARE SO OBSESSED WITH HAVING PEOPLE VOTE IS THEY WANT THE GOD GIVEN RIGHTS, POWER AND FREEDOMS YOU ALREADY POSSESS TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THEM AND ON A SPIRITUAL LEVEL THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT "VOTING" ACCOMPLISHES!
In other words, voting does just the opposite of what you have been conditioned to believe it does. There might be some issues in your local area you may want to get involved in, but forget about it on the National "Presidential" farce.
We are not telling anyone what to do or what not to do, just want to give you food for thought.
Keep in mind, America is not a capitalist system, it is a fascist system where the mega wealthy corporations and the politicians are in bed together.
You need to ask the right questions to get the correct conclusions. We have all heard that we are spending 450 million dollars a day in the war in Iraq. But the real question is...
WHO IS MAKING THAT MONEY?
You don't have to look too far. It's the defense contractors. It's corporations like Halliburton and Dyncorp along with the politicians who get kickbacks for starting these illegal wars. People suffering and dying is profitable to these sociopaths than run these companies.
Our troops are NOT fighting for your freedoms but are fighting for the profits of the defense contractors. Our occupation of Iraq is against our Constitution. Our occupation in Afghanistan is against our Constitution. Our occupation in Libya is against our Constitution...and the list goes on and on.
WHERE DID THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM ORIGINATE.....AND WHY?
The origins of the (divide and conquer), two party system goes back to Rome with the Sadducees and Pharisees. The Sadducees would have been the Democrats (Liberals) of Yeshua' day and the Pharisees... the Republicans (Conservatives).
Today, the Religious right have been fooled and deceived into thinking somehow the Republican ideals are closer to what Christianity is all about than what the Democrats believe.
Lets see what Yeshua had to say about BOTH sides:
Matthew 3:7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to where he was baptizing, he said to them: "You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? Matthew 16:6 "Be careful," Yeshua said to them. "Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees."Matthew 16:11
How is it you don't understand that I was not talking to you about bread? But be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees."
Hummmmm, doesn't look like Yeshua thought too highly of either and warned the people against following either party. The same would still hold true today.
ALL U.S. PRESIDENTS ARE CREATED TO SPLIT AMERICA INTO TWO FACTIONS (DIVIDE AND CONQUER).
ALL U.S. PRESIDENTS ARE NOTHING BUT CULT LEADERS. THE CULT FOLLOWERS ARE CALLED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.
THE ANTICHRIST AND HIS FALSE PROPHETS INCLUDE ALL U.S. PRESIDENTS:
We have it on good authority that even to be considered for the office of President you have to be an MK-ULTRA programmer/handler.
U.S. presidents all have MK-ULTRA slaves referred to a "Presidential Models". Also be aware that most Occultists in this position are heavily involved in the ritual partaking of Adrenochrome.
"For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and produce great signs and omens, to lead astray, if possible, even the elect."_
Matthew 24:24 and Mark 13:22__
In case you didn't know, in 1986 it was Ronald Reagan who signed into law that vaccine companies can't be held liable for any injury or death caused by vaccines. He basically sold your children down the river and instead of protecting them from potentially deadly vaccines, protected big Pharma.
Occultists like this have throughout history sold out children and sacrificed them to one of their many gods like Bohemian Grove and Egyptian god Moloch.
Remember, all these people including U.S. Presidents are all heavily involved in the occult and Babylonian mystery religions.
Just like scripture says in Matthew says in 24:5: "For many will come in my name".
Most of these kinds of people that have mainstream Christianity fooled are false prophets pushing the false Jesus as well as followers of the false messiah embracing them.
That includes most if not all of the mega churches, including Joel Osteen. Donald Trump is a degenerate that has had the religious right bamboozled for four years. For more on this, click here:
The religious right are just followers of the false Christ and mainstream Christianity. Ronald Reagan is another hero of the worshippers of the false Christ. Reagan was full on into the Occult and Occult practices like all these people are. He made decisions while in the White House based on Astrology.
The latest creep the Globalists have put in the White House is another pervert....Joe Biden who can't seem to keep his hands off anybody.
Biden is the next man up to do the bidding of the Illuminati and further establish a One World Government.
Billy Graham was a Freemason and spiritual guide to all Freemason U.S. Presidents. Popes and all churches that teach any kind of "eternal torment" are in this group.
Hillary Clinton is considered a Grande Dame in occult circles and as far as occult power goes, she outranks Bill Clinton. She is also a known Lesbian who has taken male hormones which she thinks will put her on a even keel with her "male" competition, pictured here with her most recent lover, Mossad Agent Huma Abedin: (pictured below)
In short, absolutely none of these people who are guiding World events are to be trusted. They are all in this together and all part of the Luceiferion occult world.
THE BEAST SYSTEM AND THE MILITARY
Have you ever wondered why most "religious people" are constantly saying "pray for our troops" and none of them are saying "Let's pray for all of the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis, Kuwaitis and civilians from Afghanistan along with other middle eastern nations that America's troops have slaughtered"?
It's because most of America is deceived by the beast system!"Hummmm, don't see any 'terrorists" here in Afghanistan, but there are miles of these cool poppy flowers though."
--
This deception pretty much has the entire mainstream "right" fooled and deceived along with most of America in general.
Somehow, the BEAST system has fooled most of mainstream Christianity into believing their "Jesus" was somehow an American nationalist or a republican or democrat and that somehow "God, Country, Flag and Military" are all the same thing and are intertwined.
How many times have you seen the below image and then watch people salute it? We can absolutely guarantee you, that the real Messiah (Yeshua), has nothing to do with the United States "flag", or it's "military", or it's "troops".
Also, don't be naive and think that the troops are "fighting for our freedoms', because even a child using just a little discernment would know that is not why the troops are deployed.
It's a deception from the "Beast" system to make you think going into the Middle East and slaughtering innocent families in Iraq (for oil) and in Afghanistan (for control of the opium drug trade) is somehow all approved by God and is somehow noble and has God's okay on it. Yeshua said his Kingdom is NOT of this World's evil and corrupt system so don't be fooled into the belief that God is somehow "blessing our troops", because he is not!
It's the Beast system controlled by the spirit of the antichrist that is behind this megalomaniacal inspired deception.
You may be interested in this speech from Mike Prysner who was part of this beast system and how he was once deceived into killing innocent people in the middle east. He is now speaking out against the travesties. Remember, the "Beast" system is really what he is exposing in this short video.
Instead of constantly parroting the "God Bless America" mantra, people should really be wondering why God's judgement hasn't taken America down yet.
EPH 5:11:DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE UNFRUITFUL DEEDS OF DARKNESS, BUT INSTEAD EXPOSE THEM;
--
By Joe Monoco
