PART THREE: WHO WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD? THESE PHOTOS PROVE HE WAS FRAMED AND DIDN'T KILL PRESIDENT KENNEDY. ALSO, AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE, FIND OUT WHO MADE THE MERCURY LOADED ROUNDS USED ON THE PRESIDENT

YOU'LL BE INTERESTED IN READING MORE ABOUT THE KENNEDY'S AND THEIR ILLUMINATI BLOODLINES:

THE KENNEDY'S:BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI

Something about the above picture of Oswald being assassinated by Jack Ruby never seemed quite right. This is not a frame from a videotape, it is a picture taken at the exact moment Ruby pulled the trigger.  There is no one in front of Oswald and Ruby. 

The camera looks to be quite high in the air and there are no steps to stand on so the photographer had to be holding the camera above his head and took this perfectly framed picture without looking through a viewfinder and yet somehow managed to frame this whole event perfectly. 

Kind of like the photographer knew it was going to happen because it seems to be set up and "staged" perfectly. It really looks like a staged movie, don't you think?

SO HOW WAS JACK RUBY SO CONVENIENTLY ABLE TO MURDER OSWALD? 

In short, it was all neatly arranged

Ruby himself had maybe developed, or was told to develop, a story that he would, immediately after visiting the Western Union office to wire cash to an employee, just walk over to the Dallas police garage and walk down the ramp ‘on the spur of the moment’ but to be there at the exact moment Oswald was to be brought out through the basement. He would be allowed to get close enough to shoot Oswald before Oswald was put into a vehicle for transfer to the county jail.

Ruby was probably told to stick to his story that he wanted to spare Jackie Kennedy the pain of coming back to Dallas for a trial of Oswald in this time period BEFORE killing a Federal employee of any kind became a FEDERAL crime.

Ruby might actually have been crazy enough to believe, or have been convinced to believe, that feelings against JFK’s assassination were so intense that the people of Dallas were so tortured that it would happen HERE, that he would actually get off, or at least get a ‘light sentence’ for the killing. 

Getting a ‘name attorney’ (Melvin Belli) to represent him probably added to his confidence that all would go well. It was probably a total shock to discover he would be convicted of murder in March 1964 and get a death sentence.
His conviction WAS overturned on a ‘technicality’ of the nature of his confession while in police custody. 

He did manage to convince Chief Justice Warren , Rep. Ford, and one or two other members of the Warren Commission to speak with him in June 1964 and he begged to be taken to Washington DC where he felt he could testify on his own behalf more clearly, but there was NO INTEREST in moving him out of Dallas the Warren Commission conclusion that a LONE NUT assassin was killed by a LONE NUT vigilante and that was that needed to ‘stand pat’, Ruby would have to stay in the Dallas jail.

The appellate court in Texas took their time before deciding late in 1966 that Ruby’s earlier conviction in Dallas was improper and that he deserved a new trial. 

A new trial was to be scheduled in April 1967 in Wichita Falls, Texas BUT in December 1966 Ruby was admitted to Parkland Hospital in Dallas for pneumonia which was quickly re-diagnosed as advanced cancer throughout his body, and he died at Parkland on January 3rd, 1967 (where JFK and Oswald had also both died).  

SO.....BOTH LONE NUTS NOW DEAD—END OF STORY! RIGHT???? Well... NO SO MUCH!

AND JUST LIKE YOU WOULD EXPECT, OSWALD'S TRANSFER AT THIS MOMENT WASN'T DECIDED BY DALLAS POLICE, LIKE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN, BUT BY HIGHER UPS IN WASHINGTON!

HERE IS FOOTAGE OF OSWALD'S ASSASSINATION YOU MAY NOT HAVE SEEN BEFORE:

MARINA OSWALD PORTER:

IN THIS 1993 INTERVIEW WITH TOM BROKAW, BROKAW TRIES BULLYING TACICS AGAINST MARINA  AND EVEN ASSERTS FLASE STATEMENTS LIKE "BALLISTICS TESTS PROVE THE BULLETS CAME FROM OWALDS GUN". 

NO SUCH CREDIBLE EVIDENCE EXISTS! AS A MATTER OF FACT, PARAFFIN TESTS PROVE OSWALD DID NOT FIRE A GUN THAT DAY!  

MARINA IS HAVING NONE OF IT AND STANDS UP FOR HERSELF AND ASSERTS LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S INNOCENCE IN SPITE OF BROKAW'S BULLYING:

=========

THE FALL GUYS

ALTERNATIVE PATSIES HAD OSWALD NOT WORKED OUT

THERE WERE PLANNED HITS ON KENNEDY (AT LEAST TWO) THAT SAME MONTH AND YEAR. ONE WAS IN TAMPA AND THE OTHER IN CHICAGO. 

IF THEY HAD KILLED KENNDY IN EITHER OF THOSE PLACE, THRE WERE PATSIES LIKE OSWALD IN PLACE. IF IT HAD BEEN IN CHICAGO, THOMAS VALLEE WOULD HAVE BEEN THE PATSY.

OTHER PATSIES IN PLACE FOR THE ASSASSINATION

FOR MORE ON THESE PLOTS, LISTEN TO OLIVER STONE STARTING AT 10:15 IN THE BELOW VIDEO.

IF THE PLOT WERE TO HAVE HAPPENED IN TAMPA WHERE SANTOS TRAFFICANTE WAS THE "BOSS", A CUBAN EXILE  NAMED GILBERTO PALICARPO LOPEZ WAS SCHEDULED TO TAKE THE FALL.

WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN THE "FALL GUY" IN TAMPA? 

MORE ON LOPEZ BELOW:

ANOTHER POSSIBLE PATSY WAS A MAN NAMED IGOR VAGANOV

MORE ON VAGANOV

OSWALD'S ASSASSINATION

Here's how patsy Oswald was silenced as  it appeared on National TV.  It almost looks like the way was cleared deliberately so it could be seen live on TV by the nation and the world on purpose:

HERE'S A SYNCHRONIZATION OF SIX FILMS OF THE INCIDENT:

BY THE WAY, JACK RUBY AND LEE OSWALD KNEW EACH OTHER: 

HERE IS AN INTERVIEW WITH BEVERLY OLIVER (THE BABUSHKA LADY?) SAYING THAT OSWALD KNEW RUBY

(BELOW)

GREAT VIDEO ON THE ABSOLUTE INNOCENCE OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD!

 HERE'S SIX MORE REASONS FOR THE INNOCENCE OF OSWALD:

OUR WEBSITE IS FREE AND ALWAYS WILL BE. IF YOU FIND OUR SITE USEFUL, PLEASE HELP US CONTINUE TO GIVE YOU THE BEST UPDATES:

WHO MURDERED JFK? WHAT REALLY HAPPENED? YOU'LL WANT TO WATCH THE BELOW DOCUMENTARY:

JFK AT 50: "THE WHO THE HOW AND THE WHY"

The magic bullet was found on Connally's stretcher on his way to surgery. We can now prove that to be a complete falsehood as we hear Connelly's doctor tell the press that the bullet was still in his leg after he came out of surgery! 
 THE SINGLE BULLET THEORY IS OFFICIALLY A LIE! CASE CLOSED!  
Before we get to the below photos of how they deliberately framed Oswald with fake and composite pictures, we want you to see this interview with detective Roger Craig who saw the "alleged" murder and described it as a German Mauser and NOT the 6.5 Italian Mannlicher–Carcano Carbine they claimed they found later. 
Both of these weapons were planted and the Italian Mannlicher–Carcano was later created to frame Oswald because in actuality, he never owned a rifle!
 When the government decides to frame someone, apparently they have no constitutional rights!
 It’s time to get the real story out! (some excerpts adapted from material written by Edward T. Haslam, author of Dr. Mary's Monkey) 
BEFORE WE EVN START, LOOK AT THESE PHOTOS AS THE ALLEGED MURDER WEAPON AS IT IS TAKEN INTO EVIDENCE. NO GLOVES WERE USED FOR THESE OFFICIALS HANDLING THE RIFLE. THE EVIDENCE IS CONTAMINATED!!!!! 
THIS IS INSANE! THIS VIOLATES CONTAMINATION OF EVIDENCE 101!!! 

(BELOW) ALSO, THIS PHOTOGRAPH ALWAYS STUCK US AS STRANGE (BELOW). A CAMERA CREW WAITING OUTSIDE FOR OSWALD TO BE ARRESTED WITH THE GUY MUGGING FOR THE CAMERA WITH A CIGAR. KIND OF LIKE IT WAS SET UP THAT WAY....DON'T YA THINK?

BELOW: MUST SEE VIDEO!
LET'S TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT ALL KNOWN POSSIBLE WEAPONS AND AMMUNITION IN AND AROUND DEALEY PLAZA 

THEY REALLY DID A BAD JOB OF FRAMING OSWALD. THE BACKYARD PHOTOS AND RIFLE "ALLEGEDLY" FOUND IN THE DEPOSITORY ARE TWO DIFFERENT RIFLES!

DOH!!!!!

Americans who believe in our Justice system know that Lee Harvey Oswald is legally innocent. The law says “innocent until proven guilty.” Not only was he never found guilty of killing either Officer Tippit or President Kennedy, he was never given a trial nor even allowed his legal right to an attorney. He should have been protected by federal marshals to prevent his murder while in the custody of the Dallas Police, but he was not. 
We can't change what happened, but we can change what people know about it. We should never let America forget that our justice system failed us (and Lee) at the critical moment. 
If Lee had lived to talk, the lies would have been exposed many years ago. Lee died so their lies could live. The day following the assassination two photographs and the negative to one of these were found by Dallas police in the garage of the Irving home where Oswald’s wife was staying. 
These two were designated as Warren Commission Exhibits (CE) 133-A and B. In 1976 the Senate Intelligence Committee discovered yet another backyard photo in the hands of the widow of a Dallas policeman. Mrs. Roscoe White said her husband once told her the picture would be very valuable some day. 
Dallas police officer Roscoe White may have had direct knowledge of the assassination and was most likely a shooter. He also was most likely involved in the murder of any witnesses to the assassination.
ROSCOE WHITE

He also may have been involved in the forged/doctored backyard photos of Oswald:

 ABOVE: In this heretofore unknown version of the backyard photo, Oswald is depicted holding the rifle in his left hand and newspapers in his right.** 

ABOVE RIGHT: IS THE CHIN OF WHITE THE ONE THEY CROPPED ONTO THE OSWALD BACKYARD PHOTO?

MOTORCYCLE POLICEMAN BOBBY HARGIS CLAIMED HE DID SEE WHITE ON THE GRASSY KNOLL RIGHT AFTER THE ASSASSINATION:

This is the same pose used by Dallas police in reenacting the photo for the Warren Commission — clear evidence that authorities were aware of the suppressed picture long before it became known to the public. This photo has been identified as CE 133-C by researchers. 

(BELOW) WHY WOULD THE POLICE MAKE A WHITE CUTOUT IMAGE OF OSWALD UNLESS THEY PLANNED TO MAKE A FORGERY? THE BELOW IMAGE WAS FOUND BY THE HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE IN 1978.

ENTER PHOTO EXPERT JACK WHITE ON THE ZAPRUDER FILM AS WELL AS OTHER PHOTOS SURROUNDING THE ASSASSINATION:

Jack White, a longtime analyst of JFK photos and films, who presented his findings of fakery to the HSCA but which the HSCA chose to disregard. 
Marina Oswald was bullied and forced by investigators to claim she took the pictures or get deported and separated from her children. But there's no way she took the pictures and are obviously doctored composite fakes! 
Here are White's observations on Oswald pictures and the Zapruder film:**
**HERE IS THE VIDEO FROM GRAPHICS AND FILM/PHOTO EXPERT JACK WHITE. THIS IS THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SUBJECT OF THESE PHOTOS AND IS A MUST SEE!!!!**

1) STANDING OFF CENTER:
 White concluded that Oswald is standing off center and outside the weight bearing alignment of his feet. A person could not stand in such a position.

2) PROPORTIONS: 
When the body proportions are brought into alignment from the knees to the head by adjusting the size of the photographs, one head is much larger than the other. =========3) OVERALL BODY SHADOWS: 
Although the photos were supposed to have been taken just seconds apart, the overall body shadows in the photographs are all different. In 133-A the photograph has a 10 o’clock shadow, 133-B a 12 o’clock shadow and 133-C a 10 o’clock shadow again. ============4) ARM AND ELBOWS: 
White said that the elbow is too high in one photograph and the elbow doesn’t show up on the one photograph of the arm were Oswald is holding the rifle. Attempts to duplicate this pose have been unsuccessful. ============5) HANDS AND FINGERS: 
In the photographs, the left hand and finger looks normal. Yet the right hand is missing fingernails and the hand appears too stubby to be normal. ============6) WATCH: 
The photographs reveal that Oswald is wearing a watch but all witnesses have stated that Oswald did not wear and didn’t own a watch. No watch was found among the possessions of Oswald and he was not wearing one when he was arrested. ==============7) RIFLE: 
When the photographs are blown up to the actual height of Oswald that was 5’9″, the rifle in the photograph is too long. When the rifle is adjusted in the photograph to it’s proper length, Oswald’s height is six inches too short.

8) SCOPE: 
White noted that in the photograph the rear end of the rifle scope is missing and pants wrinkles appear where the end of the scope is supposed to be, raising the prospect that the photo was retouched before being found by the Dallas police.

9) FACE: 
The face shows Oswald with a broad flat chin but Oswald’s Dallas Police mug shots depicted him with a pointed and cleft chin. There is a line that breaks up the grain of the photograph that runs across the chin that many say is where a cut took place to paste Oswald’s face onto the photograph. 
This strongly supports Oswald’s complaint to police that someone had pasted his face onto another’s body.

10) PHOTOGRAPHIC OVERLAY: 
When Mr. White took 133-A and 133-B, adjusted and overlaid them, nothing in the background or figure matched up as expected in two separate photos made moments apart with a handheld camera, as stated in the official testimony. 
However, the face of Oswald was a complete match on both photographs. This could only be explained if someone made a composite photo by pasting the same Oswald face on both pictures. =================11) FACE SHADOWS: 
Both photos show the same V-shaped shadow below the nose. However, on one of the photos Oswald’s head is tilted but the shadow does not adjust for this tilt. 
============12) NECK SHADOWS: 
On one of the photos there is light on the right side of the neck but the same photo shows the rifle casting a shadow in the opposite angle. 
======================13) COLLAR SIZE: 
The figure’s collar size can be determined from the photograph using a mathematical formula, which came out to size 16. Oswald wore a size 14-1/2 collar and all his clothes found among his personal belongings were in the 14.5 to 15-inch range. 
====================14) BACKGROUNDS: 
White determined that one photograph had the top cropped off and the other photograph had the bottom cropped off making it appear as if they were two separate pictures. However, except for small differences, the backgrounds matched on both photographs, meaning the camera never changed position which contradicts the official story of Oswald’s wife reluctantly walking into the backyard to take the photo. ======================
15) SMALL DIFFERENCES: 
For many months White was puzzled by the small differences he noted in the backgrounds as they were not off by much. After looking at the photographs some more he determined that on the background of one, the camera appeared to be slightly tilted. ===========RIFLE DIMENSIONS ARE TOO LONG COMPARED TO OSWALD'S HEIGHT

WHO WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD?
He then took another copy of the photo by tilting it on a board and everything came perfectly into alignment. The next question we need answered is "Who was Lee Harvey Oswald?" His ID card for the marines says his name is Alex Hidell.

DID THE GOVERNMENT CREATE 2 OSWALDS? 
it's not uncommon for black operations to use look a likes.  It confuses the public because the average person is fairly easy to fool in this manor.

ON THE BALCONY?

CONFUSED WITNESSES

THIS IS ALSO AN INTERESTING VIDEO ON THE 2 OSWALDSMORE EVIDENCE THAT THERE WERE 2 OSWALD'S CREATED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO FRAME THE REAL OSWALD!RUTH PAINE'S HUSBAND (MICHAEL) LOOKS A LOT LIKE OSWALD: THIS WAS MOST LIKELY THE MAN WITNESSES CLAIM LEFT THE DEPOSITORY AND ENTERED A RAMBLER. 

THIS WOULD EXPLAIN A LOT! 

MORE EVIDENCE FOR 2 OSWALDS: LEE AND HARVEY BELOW:
WHO WAS RUTH PAINE?

SHE WAS A FRIEND OF MARINA OSWALD AND KNEW MORE ABOUT THE ASSASSINATION THAN SHE TOLD THE WARREN COMMISSION:HOW WAS MICHAEL PAINE CONNECTED TO ALL OF THIS?

EVEN MARINA ALLUDED TO THE FACT THAT THERE TWO TWO SEPARATE "OSWALDS".
ANOTHER SUSPICIOUS PERSON IN THE "DUEL OSWALD" EVIDENCE IS LARRY CRAFARD:

SO WHO WAS LARRY CRAFARD?
MORE IN CRAFARD:

OSWALD WAS THE FRAMED PATSY:One thing we do know about Lee Harvey Oswald is he had nothing to do with the murder of President Kennedy.

To see how the power elite tried to frame him, first look at a picture in life magazine of him supposedly posing with a rifle in his backyard. (ABOVE).

ABOVE: Now let's take a good look at those pictures. We've enlarged his hand holding the rifle. Hummmm, looks like someone cut off the ends of his fingers with a meat cleaver with no fingernails. Very sloppy cut and pasting from whomever forged these pictures.  

Now take a close look at his chin. You'll see where someone has super imposed his head on a fake chin as you can see the chin is flat unlike a real chin which is rounded. (BELOW)

ABOVE: YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THE LINE WHERE OSWLAD'S FACE WAS INSERTED ABOVE SOMEONE ELSE'S CHIN:

Next you can see a "ghost" Oswald which was found by the House Assassinations committee in FBI files which proves they were doctoring the photos with blank imaging which they later filled in with fake Oswald pictures. (ABOVE) 
The last area of evidence that I found compelling, but other investigators often have not, is in the area of his hands, arms and the newspapers and rifle he is holding. Those backyard photos about are the only evidence linking Oswald to the murder weapon. 
 A nitrate test on his cheek on the day of the assassination (to determine if he fired the rifle) was negative. There was a belated finding of his palm print on an inside part of the rifle, after it had been dismantled, which has understandably been greeted with skepticism in the JFK “conspiracy” community. 
 There were no fingerprints on either the rifle or the pistol that were identified as Oswald’s murder weapons. Oswald had to be an idiot if he was the real assassin. Earlier in 1963, he was arrested for the attempted murder of Edwin Walker. 
That was undoubtedly a set up/frame up, to portray him as violent and capable of murder. So, he obviously would have been suspect number one if he really shot JFK, employed in the building where the shots were fired, with a rifle he not only bought months earlier, but used in another assassination attempt.
With all those incriminating circumstances, we are supposed to believe that he carefully wiped his fingerprints off the rifle before he snuck out of the depository but forgot to get his "palm print" off? 
 But then he also was so stupid that he just put the rifle in the corner of the depository between some crates then went down 4 flights of stairs, bought a coke and hung around the machine so a police officer could see him, and that he had no plan of escape, taking a bus and cab before lamely trying to hide in a theater? -- 
Far more likely is that the “safe house” plan that Hunt devised, evaporated when JFK was really shot, and Oswald did what he could, on his own, as the world’s most marked man. 
Let's also not forget that Oswald was seen as late as 12:25 on the second floor of the depository. So you say, "Well since the limo came down Elm street at 12:30, Oswald had plenty of time to get to the 6th floor in 5 minutes." -- Well, what you don't know is the motorcade was 5 minutes late that day!!!! 
 In other words is was scheduled to come down Elm street in front of the depository at 12:25, not 12:30. Oswald would not have known it was late but would have been expecting it at 12:25, but at that time, we know he was on the second floor!! 
ENTER BILLY LOVELADY


GET IT? OSWALD COULDN'T HAVE DONE IT!! -- THE BELOW COMMENTARY IS FROM "THE MAN IN THE DOORWAY" 

WHO WAS THE MAN IN THE DOORWAY? OSWALD? LOVELADY? OR SOMETHING OR SOMEONE ELSE ENTIRELY....

MORE INFORMATION ON THE "ALTERED IMAGE" IN THE DOORWAY. WHO IS IN IT? OSWALD OR LOVELADY OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY?

The top photograph is a photograph taken by AP photographer James Altgen immediately after President Kennedy was hit with the first bullet. What is important about the photo is that in the background Altgen also photographs who appears to be Lee Harvey Oswald standing in the first floor doorway of the Texas Schoolbook Depository at the very moment Kennedy was shot. 

The second photos are blowups of the Oswald figure in the doorway. According to the official Warren Commission Report, Oswald was supposed to be shooting at Kennedy from the 6th floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository. In order to cover for this obvious problem, the Warren Commission identified the individual in the doorway as Billy Lovelady, a fellow Book Depository employee who had a similar appearance to Oswald. Lovelady died on January 1979 from heart failure (the later House Committee Report on Assassinations was issued in March 1979, havingbegun in 1976). 
Lovelady identified himself as the person in the Altgens' photo to the Warren Commission. 
LOVELADY AND THE MAGICAL CHANGING SHIRT:


One problem with Lovelady's claim is that he testified before the Warren Commission that he was sitting on the steps to the Texas Book Depository eating his lunch when the Presidential motorcade drove by. He stated that two fellow employees, Bill Shelley and Sarah Stanton, were "right behind" him.
 As one can see in the photo, nobody is standing behind the person in the doorway and that person is clearly standing in the doorway, not sitting on the steps. Lovelady stated that he then heard what he thought at the time were firecrackers. 
He did not know that President Kennedy had been shot until a coworker, Gloria Cavalry, ran up and told him. If it was Lovelady in the entranceway, he would not have had to been told that the President had been shot, because the man in the entranceway had a perfect line of sight to the assassination. 

As one can see, the person in the entranceway is looking at Kennedy at the moment the first shot hit Kennedy; he would have seen the final shot explode President Kennedy's head; he would have seen Mrs. Kennedy crawling on the trunk of the limousine grabbing his brains and the Secret Service agent jump in the limousine before it sped off. 
The whole purpose for people to be watching the motorcade was to see the President, and man in the entranceway was no exception; he was looking directly at President Kennedy as he was being shot. 
Furthermore, if Lovelady were the man in the doorway, he would have testified to what he saw, but he did not, because he was sitting down on the steps eating his lunch; he was only able to testify to what he heard. That point is made clear by the question not asked by the Warren Commission counsel. 
The Counsel asked Lovelady what he heard, but he did not ask Lovelady what he saw. Why didn't he ask Lovelady such a basic question like "what did you see?" 
Because he knew that Lovelady would testify that he did not see anything at the time of the shooting, because he was sitting down eating his lunch. 
If he did not see anything, then he could not have been the man in the doorway, because the man in the doorway is looking directly at the limousine at the time the first shot hits Kennedy! If Lovelady answered that he did not see anything, it would have established that it was Oswald in the doorway, and that was something the Warren Commission did not want established. 

Another problem with that identification is that Lovelady stated that he wore a red and white vertically striped shirt that day. 
Other photos taken on November 22, 1963 revealed that Lovelady was in fact wearing a large squared, bold patterned, red and blue plaid shirt. The man in the doorway could not be Lovelady, because it does not appear that the man is wearing either a striped or a plaid patterned shirt. 
The real fly in the Lovelady story is that the man in the doorway appears to be wearing the same clothing Oswald was wearing on that very day, the day Oswald was arrested, and the clothing is worn by him in exactly the same fashion as the man in the doorway: unbuttoned to the midsection. 
IS IT POSSIBLE LOVELADY WAS IN ON IT?

The fourth photograph down is a photograph taken of Oswald shortly after his arrest, the day President Kennedy was shot. 

Notice, he is wearing the same tweed shirt and tee-shirt combination, with the shirt halfway open. Reportedly, color film photographs taken from a different angle that day, show the color of the shirt worn by the man in the doorway to be orange-brown. 
When Oswald was arrested, he was wearing the identical orange-brown shirt with missing buttons and tee-shirt underneath. 
Reportedly, Oswald told the Dallas Police that he was standing in the doorway of the Texas Book Depository when Kennedy was shot, just as depicted in the photo. It appears that Oswald was just what he said he was: a "patsy." 
The conspirators had to kill Oswald, because they new that the evidence against him would never stand up to courtroom scrutiny.



The fifth photo in the sequence is a montage of photos that appeared on pages 24 and 25 of the December 14, 1963 issue of Post. Notice in the fourth car back the Secret Service Agents in Vice President Lyndon Johnson's detail are getting out of their cars to come to the protection of LBJ as the shots are heard. 
That indicates that the motorcade must have come to a complete stop, which is consistent with the numerous eyewitnesses who saw the motorcade come to a complete stop. 
 It is much easier to shoot a stationary target, and the conspirators planned to have the Kennedy limousine stopped. Oddly, Kennedy's Secret Service detail had not yet even made a move to protect Kennedy after the first shot. 


Listen to this video where Jack Ruby talks about other factions involved in the assassination and even goes as far to implicate Johnson!
 The below video is a great expose' on who Oswald was, called LEE HARVEY OSWALD, SHEEP DIPPED PATSY Oswald was telling the truth when he said he was a "patsy".  Every witness that was close to the President at the time of the murder said the shots came from behind the picket fence to the front right of the motorcade.
 WHO WAS BUELL WESLEY FRAZIER?  

This is an interesting video with an interview with Buell Wesley Frazier who knew Oswald personally and was a co-worker at the depository. Here he talks about the corrupt Dallas Police who interrogated him when he was only 19 years old and even tried to force him to sign a confession that he was part the the assassination of Kennedy.  
It's well worth your time to listen. 
He also knows full well that Oswald had nothing to do with the assassination. 

FRAZIER SAYS THE DALLAS POLICE ACTUALLY TRIED TO FRAME HIM AND TIE HIM TO THE ASSASSINATION BY PRESSURING HIM INTO GIVING A FALSE CONFESSION!

MORE WITH FRAZIER
  THE BIG FRAME UP: CURTAIN RODS AND THE CHICKEN LUNCH. FIND OUT MORE ABOUT LBJ AND HOW MUCH CONNELLY KNEW ABOUT THE ASSASSINATION BEFORE HAND.ALSO:FRAZIER WAS ONE OF THE PEOPLE THE POLICE TRIED TO FRAME:

FRAZIER AND EVERYTHING HE KNOWS:

WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE "BAGS" FOUND IN THE DEPOSITORY? 

MORE TESTIMONY FROM DEPOSITORY EMPLOYEES.
NOTE: THERE MOST LIKELY WAS SHOTS FIRED FROM THE DEPOSITORY AS SOME WITNESSES CLAIM. BUT CLEARLY NOT FROM THAT 6th FLOOR WE ARE TOLD AND NOT FROM OSWALD:

WHEN YOU LISTEN TO ALL THE WITNESSES IN DEALEY PLAZA THAT DAY, IT BECOMES MORE THAN OBVIOUS THE PRESIDENT WAS CAUGHT IN A CROSS FIRE FROM SEVERAL LOCATIONS:

(BELOW) We believe the man who fired from the picket fence is a man named James Files.**
WHO ACTUALLY FIRED THE SHOT THAT KILLED JFK: SEE THE FULL INTERVIEW HERE
In his interview, Files talked about a man named "Wolfman" who supplied him with the mercury loaded bullets which he used to kill the President. 
WHO WAS WOLFMAN? 
WAS GEORGE COLLURA "WOLFMAN"? READ THE LINK BELOW TO FIND OUT.
WHO WAS THE MAN WHO SUPPLED THE HOLLOW POINT, MERCURY FILLED BULLETS TO FILES? 
(BELOW) This is an interesting short film by Ron Frey. 
He simulates the position of Files at the fence, the securing his weapon (Fireball) after he took the shot and the time it took him to get to where he was parked to pick up Johnny Roselli and Charles Nicoletti who were already in the car. 
The video here is done in real time as to how long it took people to react and where Files would have been as he walked away along with retracing the route he took. 
James Files parked on Houston street facing north, so after shots were fired from the second floor of the Dal Tex building by Roselli (spotter) and Nicoletti, they came downstairs placing the rifle wrapped In long coat into trunk of 62 impala burgundy exterior with black seats. Roselli sat in the back and Nicoletti in front passenger seat. 
James Files walked out of plaza turned left on Houston street got into car and drove them to a shell station across from cabana hotel dropping both Roselli and Nicoletti off at 2nd car. 
Files drove to mesquite to lamplighter motel, stayed the night then drove to Chicago the following day.
 Now, let's take a closer look at Billy Lovelady and the man in the doorway in Part 4. 
 Click Below: 
NEXT:ABSOLUTE VISUAL PROOF OSWALD WAS INNOCENT 
PREVIOUS: 
SEX AND DECEPTION IN THE ZAPRUDER FILM **
EPH 5:11:DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE UNFRUITFUL DEEDS OF DARKNESS, BUT INSTEAD EXPOSE THEM;**

Website Tracking