PART TWO: HAS THE ZAPRUDER FILM BEEN ALTERED? IS THERE A SECRET FILM THAT THE PUBLIC HAS NEVER SEEN?

YOU'LL BE INTERESTED IN READING MORE ABOUT THE KENNEDY'S AND THEIR ILLUMINATI BLOODLINES:

THE KENNEDY'S:BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI

WHAT ZAPRUDER SAID:

WHAT WAS ZAPRUDER'S ROLE IN THIS? 

WAS HE UNKNOWINGLY ON THE PAYROLL? 

ONE THING WE DO KNOW AND THAT'S THAT ZAPRUDER FILM IS A FAKE COMPOSITE OF SEVERAL FILMS.

BEFORE WE START OUR INVESTIGATION, LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THE DIGITALLY ENHANCED ZAPRUDER FILM THAT WE HAVE ALL SEEN:

There are many good video's that show beyond a doubt, the Zapruder film has in fact been altered and significantly altered as Author David Lifton points out. This one is one of the best in tracing what happened from start to finish. He also goes into detail about how Oswald was framed as well. Well worth the watch.

OUR WEBSITE IS FREE AND ALWAYS WILL BE. IF YOU FIND OUR SITE USEFUL, PLEASE HELP US CONTINUE TO GIVE YOU THE BEST UPDATES:

 
=======

IMPORTANT!!!

 MOST OF THE VIDEOS BELOW HAVE BEEN AGE RESTRICTED BECAUSE EVEN IN IT'S EDITED STAGE CAN BE VERY UPSETTING TO MANY PEOPLE.

PLEASE USE YOUR DISCRETION WHEN VIEWING VIDEOS OF A MAN BEING BRUTALLY MURDERED IN BROAD DAYLIGHT!

========

 
After you have read this article, you may want to come back to these videos. It's a little long, but it needs to be to explain that the Zapruder film has been altered. ===========(BELOW) THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THIS FILM WAS SHOWN TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. IT WAS AIRED ON GOOD NIGHT AMERICA WITH GERALDO RIVERA ON MARCH 6th, 1975. IT IS INTRODUCED BY ROBERT GRODEN
This actually has some good information that is still relevant even today particularly about who Jack Ruby was and his role in the assassination:
HERE IS ANOTHER SHOW FROM 1975 ON GERALDO WHERE JOSIAH THOMPSON SHOWS EVIDENCE EVEN THEN THAT THE OFFICIAL STORY IS NOTHING BUT LIES AND A WHITEWASH. 
THESE FACTS ARE STILL TRUE TODAY:

NOW THIS IS A LECTURE BY ROBERT GRODEN in 2022, 47 years later:

ABOVE: THE ZAPRUDER FILM MOST PEOPLE HAVE SEEN:
NOW THE FILM WE HAVE ALL SEEN SLOWED DOWN:

BELOW: 
A fairly accurate presentation of the Zapruder Film although as you might suspect, there is no mention of the film being altered by government goons. While they do mention a "bootleg" copy existing, there is no mention of an entirely different film that has never been seen by the public:

BELOW IS ZAPRUDER'S FILM WITH EVERYTHING HE HAD ON THE FILM BEFORE DEALEY PLAZA:

The Zapuder film wasn't shown to the public until March 6th  1975 on Goodnight America hosted by Geraldo Rivera. 

Three days after the assassination, Dan Rather describes the film but the networks would not show the film. Rather blatantly lies and says you can see Kennedy's head go "forward", when in fact his head goes violently "backward" .  

That is why Rather was promoted so fast in the national media scene because he went along with this lie. 

Below you can see Rather's lie synced up with the Zapruder Film starting at 14:50 thru 16:33.

 Below is Rather's B.S. in it's entirety:

First off let's take a look at Zapruder's Bell & Howell camera:

OTHER CAMERAS IN DEALEY PLAZA THAT DAY AT :30.
WHO WAS ABRAHAM ZAPRUDER? 

Abraham Zapruder, next to his wife, Lillian Zapruder, poses for a photograph holding his brand-new Bell & Howell 8mm camera soon after he had purchased it in 1962. In 1963, he created a landmark film by using it to film President Kennedy's motorcade parade in downtown Dallas

Let's listen to Zapruder tell his story to WFAA TV on the day of the assassination. One thing to take note of is he says he started filing as the motorcade was making it's turn from Houston on to Elm. We see no such turn in the film. There were also initial reports about a "secret service man" being shot and killed. How in the world could they make such an error?  More evidence the film has been altered:

THERE IS ALSO EVIDENCE THE Z FILM IS A COMPOSITE IF SEVERAL FILMS. IF THAT'S TRUE EACH LOCATION HAD TO BE FILMED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EACH OTHER:

Abraham Zapruder was a dressmaker who owned Jennifer Juniors, a shop on the edge of Dealey Plaza. He was 58 on the day the president came to Dallas. As filmmakers go, he was, in every sense of the word, an amateur. So, what allowed him to keep filming after shots rang out? How could he hold the camera so still, even with abject horror exploding in front of him?

Though Zapruder need only walk outside the door of his Elm St. business to see the motorcade, his trip to Texas took a more circuitous route.

Zapruder was born in Russia in 1905, immigrating to the U.S. at age 15 and settling in a Brooklyn tenement. He initially worked as a pattern-marker in the city's bustling garment industry.

He married wife Lillian in 1933, and the middle-class parents of two followed a business opportunity to Texas during World War II.

Their son Henry attended Harvard Law, graduating the year before the assassination. Daughter Myrna worked as a Kennedy campaign volunteer in 1960.

Zapruder eventually opened his own business, and launched a dress line named Jennifer Juniors, Inc. His offices were in the Dal-Tex building in Dealey Plaza where no doubt is one of the buildings the shots came from..

The businessman planned to shoot some film of the presidential visit, but instead left his camera at home because of overcast morning skies.

His prior cinematic stabs included shooting family holidays and beach getaways in the Rockaways.

As the clouds over Dallas cleared, Zapruder's secretary Marilyn Sitzman urged him to go home and grab the camera. "You're the one that makes the beautiful movies," she said. Sitzman passed away in 1993. You can see both Zapruder and Sitzman on the "Zapruder pedestal. 

Marilyn Sitzman

Zapruder, after initially blanching, finally agreed — a choice that came to define his life.

Accompanied by three co-workers, the camera-toting Zapruder left the office to await the presidential motorcade. He found a good sightline atop a 4-foot tall concrete pedestal, and began to film.

Here is her story which has changed over the years with some glaring inconsistencies:

INCONSISTENCIES WITH SITZMAN'S STORY OVER THE YEARS

ABRAHAM ZAPRUDER AND MARILYN SITZMAN FROM THE MOORMAN POLAROID:

I find it strange that both Zapruder and Sitzman both are looking behind the pergola seconds after the assassination.

HERE ARE SOME INTERESTING STILLS OF ZAPRUDER WHERE HIS IMAGE WAS CAUGHT IN OTHER FILMS:

(BELOW) YOU CAN SEE OTHER INCONSISTENCIES AND FRAMES THAT DON'T ADD UP IN THE Z FILM:

THE LIMO JUST "SUDDENLY" APPEARS IN THE FILM 

FRAME 132

FRAME 133

A police motorcycle swung into his lens, followed by the limousine ferrying the president and his wife in its back seat.

Zapruder heard an initial bang but never lost his focus. There was a second shot, followed instantly by the image that stayed with Zapruder until his own death: JFK's head exploding at the moment of the bullet's impact.

"They killed him!" he screamed in disbelief. "They killed him!" 

Abraham Zapruder died of cancer in 1970 at 65.

How can we look at something that is supposed to have created a record of what happened and question whether or not that what we are seeing is, in fact, what occurred?
It's simple, Zapruder was not "in on it". His film was out of his possession for several hours after the assassination and that's where the manipulating of the film took place.  
FRAMES WERE EDITED AND SPLICED IN LIFE MAGAZINE AS WELL:

IS THE ZAPRUDER FILM A COMPOSITE OF THREE FILMS?

Zapruder film researchers Horne and Janney discovered irrefutable evidence that Americans were lied to about the chain of custody and prove that the camera original Zapruder film was in the custody of the CIA and/or Secret Service and not LIFE magazine from late Saturday evening, November 23rdthrough Monday morning November 25^th, but is of such a provocative nature that it strongly suggests  indeed, virtually proves the original film was altered that weekend, prior to the publication of any photos in LIFE magazine, and prior to its use by the Warren Commission. WHY?It's been fabricated to hide multiple gunshots. There is another film that has never seen by the public and can't be found anywhere on the internet. It was not taken by Zapuder but is from roughly the same shooting location and no one really knows (except for the perpetrators) who has possession of the original unedited Zapruder film.  

(ABOVE)LEFT IS FROM THE Z FILM. NOTICE HOW THE BACK OF THE PICKUP HAS A COVER. (WAS IT DRAWN IN?) 
THE IMAGE ON THE RIGHT IS FROM THE CANCELLARE PHOTO AND IT SHOWS A MAN IN THE BACK OF THE SAME PICKUP TRUCK BUT THIS TIME WITH NO COVER. BOTH CANNOT BE CORRECT!!!

MORE STRANGE IMAGES FROM THAT DAY IN DALLAS:
From what we understand, the real film has extremely good quality. Professional quality. it shows the limo turn from Houston on to Elm street. 

It them shows the limo come to a complete stop where Kennedy is hit multiple times from multiple directions. The Zapruder film shows none of this. Here is a breakdown on why, without question, the Zapruder film has been altered. 
 
U.S. AIR FORCE VETRAN RICH DELLAROSA TELL US HE HAS SEEN THE UNEDITED VERSION THAT HAS NEVER BEEN SHOWN IN PUBLIC WHERE THE LIMO COMES TO A COMPLETE STOP:
MORE ON HIS STORY BELOW
To start with, the Zapruder film which is the only film in existence (at least publicly) of the assassination from beginning to end has been tampered with. 
 It is the oldest trick in the book to put subliminal messages in print and film to trick the viewers brain into seeing something that isn't there. Look first at Zapruder film frame 312. LOOK AT THE TOP RIGHT HAND CORNER OF THE LIMO: 

Look in the grass over the driver of the limousine. You will see the word "SEX". It has been superimposed over here so you can see where it is. Now look at Zapruder film frame 236. Look at the word "SEX" again in various places. 
See if you see them without us telling you where they are. Advertisers frequently use the word "sex" on the models foreheads in magazines. Here is the clip without the overlay.

(BELOW) In this clip, you see all kinds of strange markings. Some are words and some look like gang graffiti.

THIS ABOVE FILM IS A COMPILATION OF TWO FILMS SHOT AT TWO DIFFERENT TIMES:

(BELOW) MARY MOORMAN, TOOK THE FAMOUS POLAROID AT THE INSTANT KENNEDY WAS SHOT.  

(BELOW) OTHER PICTURES OF JEAN HILL AND MARY MOORMAN TAKEN EARLIER ON THE MORNING OF THE ASSASSINATION.  
PICTURES TAKEN EARLIER IN THE DAY SHOW BOTH WEARING DARK SHOES:
BUT IN THE ZAPRUDER FILM THEY BOTH SEEM TO BE IN WHITE SHOES. 
ALSO IN HER POLAROID PICTURE THE MOTORCADE IS SEVERAL FEET IN FRONT OF HER AND TO HER LEFT. 
THE Z FILM SHOWS KENNEDY TO HER RIGHT WHEN SHE SNAPPED THE PICTURE.
ALSO, MOORMAN CLAIMED SHE WAS STANDING IN THE STREET WHEN SHE SNAPPED THE PHOTO.  
YOU CAN SEE THE Z FILM SHOWS HER ON THE GRASS AND HILL LOOKS TO BE EXTREMELY PIGEON TOED WITH HER LEFT LEG LOOKING EXTREMELY STRANGE AND SHE ISN'T EVEN LOOKING AT KENNEDY BUT IS LOOKING TO HER RIGHT.

MORE ON THIS IN THE VIDEO BELOW:

BELOW: MUCHMORE FILM STILLS

BTW: BELOW IS TESTIMONY OF EMMITT HUDSON WHO WAS THE GROUNDS KEEPER IN DEALEY PLAZA AND IS THE MAN IN THE HAT ON THE STAIRS. 
THE OTHER TWO MEN HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED ONLY THAT THE AFRICAN AMERICAN MAN TOLD HUDSON HE WORKED ON INDUSTRIAL BLVD. 

HE AND HIS WIFE WERE SEATED UNDER THE CONCRETE BARRIER WHERE "BLACK DOG MAN" WAS IN THESE PHOTOS. 
THIS PHOTO IS MOST LIKELY HIS WIFE AND NOT A MAN AT ALL STANDING UP JUST BEFORE THE MOTORCADE REACHED THEM. 
INTERESTING THAT IN THIS PHOTO THERE ARE ONLY TWO MEN ON THE STAIRS: 

THE GROUNDSKEEPER ON THE STAIRS:TESTIMONY OF EMMITT HUDSON

BACK TO "INBEDS" IN THE ZAPRUDER FILM:
NASA uses the same "inbed" tactics in their CGI images of the Globe:

If you want more information on "inbeds" click the article below: 
SEX IN SUBLIMINAL ADVERTISING: IT AFFECTS YOUR MIND, EVEN WHEN YOU'RE NOT AWARE OF IT. 
THE ZAPRUDER FILM: We want you pay attention to a few things. One, "jump cuts". When video tapes and films are edited by removing frames, either electronically or physically, the film will jump ahead to where the edits took place. 
The first jump cut is at the beginning of the film. You'll see a pan of the top of Elm street and then all of the sudden, the limo appears out of thin air. You'll see jump cuts as the limo comes out from behind the Stemmons freeway sign as well as when Kennedy is hit in the right temple. 
The thing here is even after the film has been altered to hide multiple shots, it's still obvious that Kennedy is hit from the right front which could only mean a shot from behind the picket fence along the grassy knoll. 
 In addition to subliminals, (inbeds) all through the Z-film, there are missing frames, frames reversed and frames that have been blacked out. The film has been tampered with to hide all the evidence of multiple shooters. 
YOU'LL FIND IT INTERESTING THAT THEY ALSO HAVE EDITED THE STEMMONS FREEWAY SIGN TO HIDE EVIDENCE OF MULTIPLE SHOOTERS:

(BELOW) IS THE HEADSHOT FROM FRAME 312 AND 313 FROM THE "Z" FILM

HERE IS THE ENTIRE SEQUENCE FROM THE ZAPRUDER FILM YOU HAVE BEEN SHOWED: ALL THESE FRAMES HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO HIDE THE COMPLETE LIMO STOP AND MULTIPLE GUNSHOTS 

 The same is true of the Nix film filmed on the other side of Dealey Plaza as well. 

BELOW: A COMPARISON OF THE ZAPRUDER FILM ALONG SIDE OTHER KNOWN FILMS OF THE ASSASSINATION:

This stunning new proof of the fabrication of the two most important films of the assassination focuses attention on the agency in immediate control of the most important evidence in the assassination, which was the Secret Service. Indeed, there are more than 15 indications of Secret Service complicity in setting up JFK for the hit, including leaving two Secret Service agents at Love Field; 
ordering the vehicles in the wrong sequence, with the President’s first instead of in the middle of the motorcade; not welding manhole covers; 
not covering the open windows; allowing the crowd to spill out into the street; ordering the 112th Military Intelligence unit to “stand down”; 
directing the accompanying motorcycle officers to not ride forward beyond the rear wheels; taking an improper motorcade route; 
not responding when shots began to be fired; pulling the limo to the left and to a halt to insure he would be killed; using a bucket of water and sponge to clean blood and brains from the back seat at Parkland Hospital; sending the limo back to Ford Motor Company to be dismantled and rebuilt; 
and removing autopsy photos and X-rays from Bethesda, making them unavailable during preparation of the autopsy report. The fabrication and distortion of the photographic record is the final missing piece of the complex puzzle of the cover-up in the assassination.
ALL THE FILMS PUBLICLY SHOWN HAVE BEEN ALTERED! 
THE LIMO ACTUALLY STOPPED IN REALITY!  THE ZAPRUDER FILM SHOW NO SUCH STOPPAGE OF THE LIMO:

LISTEN TO BILL NEWMAN WHO WAS ONLY A FEW FEET FROM THE PRESIDENT, INSIST THE CAR STOPED!

BILL NEWMAN:


MISSING FRAMES:

THE REAL ZAPRUDER FILM HAS BEEN HIDDEN FROM THE PUBLIC TO THIS VERY DAY
Among the most important proofs of film alteration have been those provided by Doug Horne, who became Senior Analyst for Military Affairs for the civilian board (technically, the Assassination Records Review Board or the “ARRB”), and by Rich DellaRosa, who reports having viewed the unaltered film on three occasions. 
Horne interviewed Homer McMahon, who was then in charge of the color photo section of the National Photo Interpretation Center, who told him that an agent identifying himself as “William Smith” brought him a copy of the film the night of the assassination, asking him to prepare a briefing board for an unidentified official. 
He said he had viewed the film at least ten times and determined that there had been six to eight impacts from at least three different directions. Horne’s report appears in Murder in Dealey Plaza (2000) along with studies of the medical evidence demonstrating that JFK was hit four times: once in the throat (from in front), once in the back (from behind), and twice in the head (from behind and from in front). 
So if Connally was hit as many as three times (from the side), there were as many as seven impacts from three directions. 
Another fascinating source of information has come from Rich DellaRosa, who today moderates a research site at JFKresearch.com. He reports having seen what appears to be the original film on three occasions. He observed the limo driver steer to the left. 
The stop was so sudden that it jostled the occupants. If you want to listen to DellaRosa's account, you can hear it here:
   This observation is confirmed by close study of the Zapruder film itself, where frames show passengers being thrown forward immediately after the head shot at Frame 313. 
This indicates that the sequence of events has been reversed. There were actually two head shots before the vehicle resumed its forward movement. DellaRosa’s report can be found as Appendix E of The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2003), which includes a color photo section that reveals the massive blow-out to the President’s head, which is visible in Frame 374. 
It corresponds closely to diagrams from physicians and Mantik’s study of the alteration of the cranial X-rays. These fabrications were used to discount witness reports (at least 40, including at Parkland and at Bethesda) of such a blowout. 
Immediately following JFK's assassination in Dallas, government agents fanned out through the crowd and confiscated all the films they could find that were being taken of Kennedy's motorcade. One of several exceptions was Abraham Zapruder's home movie which showed the entire assassination. =======At 4:15 in the video below, Gov. Connelly says the limo sped away right after the last shot was fired. (HE ACCELERATED IT TREMENDOUSLY) is what Connelly says.  The Zapruder film widely shown shows no such acceleration. His testimony also directly indicates he was hit by an entirely different shot than were the shots that hit Kennedy:

Here is Connelly again at 7:25 saying the first shot "DID NOT' hit him:

This film was purchased by Time magazine. Time magazine promptly altered key frames and eliminated others in order to obstruct and eliminate key evidence of a conspiracy. 
Those home movies that were seized by the government that afternoon, were never seen or heard again. Regis Kennedy, one of the FBI agents who was gathering up those home movies that afternoon, was served a summons by the House select committee on assassinations to explain what happened to all those home movies. 
On the very day he was to testify to that committee, he was found murdered. Over 200 key witnesses to JFK's assassination, who could have testified to the truth of what happened that day, have died under mysterious circumstances, or have been outright murdered. 
Assassinating Kennedy, and putting their man Johnson into the presidency helped the military industrial complex and the shadow government reassert their power, and that will help you understand what's been going on in America ever since Kennedy's assassination. 
This is another film about the mystery of the Zapruder film. It's a little long, but well worth a watch:

THE "OTHER" FILM SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN SHOT FROM THE RIGHT OF ZAPRUDER BUT IN VERY CLOSE PROXIMITY ACCORDING TO THOSE THAT HAVE SEEN IT. 

THE BELOW FIGURE HAS NEVER BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR. OR COULD HE BE THE FAKE SS MAN WHO FLASED CREDENTIALS TO INITIAL POLICE WHO RAN UP THE KNOLL?

IF IT IS, IT WOULD BE CIA OPERATIVE BERNARD BARKER ACCORDING TO WITNESS ANDREW SUMMERS:

“He was about 5’10, to 6 ft.... well dressed, had a tie on, and a coat over his arm. He also had a [Stetson style] hat on. Also, he had a gun under his coat. It wasn’t uncovered. I was running straight at him, so I could see the barrel under the coat. And he said, “Better not come up here, you could get shot.” I didn’t argue with him, because he looked like a man of authority. I thought maybe a Detective, or an FBI man.” — Andrew Summers.

Picture: Bernard Barker carrying coat, wearing stetson-style hat, born Havana, Cuba, aged 46 at the time of assassination walks out from picket fence area stopping people proceeding to that area.

Dealey Plaza witness Malcolm Summers had no idea where the shots came from but ran towards the grassy knoll area as others were doing to get to the railway tracks and said he was stopped by a well dressed man with long coat or trench coat hanging over his arm with a handgun in his hand who shouted to him to stop and turn around as he might get shot if he goes behind the picket fence area near the rear of the TSBD. No badge or I.D. was shown but his dress made him appear to be a detective or secret serviceman. (a still photo image of a well dressed man standing near the picket fence can be clearly seen holding a coat over his arm with his forearm extended horizontally, with a police officer standing a few feet away talking to a teenaged girl.

“The shots I heard definately came from behind and above me" – Emmet Hudson, Dealey Plaza groundskeeper standing on the steps that led up the grassy slope to Pergolas or Arbors.

“I thought the shot came from back of me.” – Abraham Zapruder, standing on concrete slab.

“The shots came from the grassy area down this way...in the direction... the parade was going, in the bottom of that direction.” – O.V. Campbell, vice president of the Book Depository. — referred in some comments as the pear-shaped man.

S.A. Kenneth O’Donnell begins to bless himself, David Powers murmurs “Mary, Jesus and Joseph.” Powers later said that he and O’Donnell clearly saw the shots come from the grassy knoll. Powers says he felt sure they were “riding into an ambush,” explaining why Greer begins to slow the limo.

Andrew Summers described after the shots and the motorcade procession cleared out....I immediately ran across the street (Elm) toward the grassy knoll (about 40 feet to the right of where Abraham Zapruder was filming). I was stopped by a guy....

I described [the gun] to the Sheriff’s Department over there...They asked me what did the muzzle look like. When I described the barrel, they said it sounded like an automatic...the Secret Service came out to my shop to interview me on two different occasions.

The first time, it was about three of them that came... I told them about the guy who stopped me and all that. I told them he looked like an FBI guy, or Secret Service, or a local city detective. They said, “Okay, we’ll take a report and get back to you.”

I was wondering why they didn’t come back sooner, but about two months later, they told me that they did not have FBI men, or Secret Service, or a city detective that was in that vicintity where this guy stopped me... They basically told me I didn’t see anything, because they didn’t have anybody there... I was disappointed... because I knew I saw somebody there... It just didn’t make sense.”

NOTE: Bernard L Barker was born March 17, 1917 in Havana, Cuba, sent ny his father and Cuban mother to the States for education and became an,American citizen and was in the United States Air Force. Barker would have been 46 in November, 1963. His role appears to be that of a ‘distractor' to divert attention away from the fleeing gunmen. He was the man seen in a suit, cowboy hat carrying a coat over his arm near the picket fence.

SEYMOUR WEITZMAN, constable saw a woman who was screaming they were shooting from the bushes and ran up the grassy knoll to search the bushes and checking the parking lot, when asked about the parking lot he said, “Yes sir, I checked all the cars. I looked into all the cars and checked around the bushes. Of course, I wasn’t alone.”

PICTURE: Members of one of the ‘press cars' who alighted from cars with cameras to film the events showing a good view of the opposite grassy knoll where CIA operative, Tosh Plumlee and “Sergio" said they were standing watching the motorcade.

“There was some deputy sheriff with me, and I believe one Secret Service man WHEN I GOT THERE ... I pulled my pistol from my holster, and I thought, this is silly, I don’t know who I am looking for, and I put it back [holstered his gun], just as I did, he showed me that he was a Secret Service agent.” — officer Smith.

Leibeler: Did you accost this man?

Smith: Well, he saw me coming with my pistol and right away he showed me who he was.

Leibeler: Do you remember who it was?

Smith: No, sir; I don’t—because then we started checking the cars. In fact, I was checking the bushes, and I went through the cars, and I started over here in this particular direction.

Picture: Bernard Barker, the fake Secret Service agent seen coming from the picket fence.

The Zapruder Film Mystery from E2 Films on Vimeo.

These treasonous murderers are opposed to everything the United States is supposed to represent, such as truth, freedom and justice. This is why they go to such great lengths to keep their methods of operation, their true purpose, and even their existence, under a cloak of secrecy. 
If Americans knew the truth about all of this, they would rise up in anger and hold them all accountable. As long as these forces remain in control of the government, the cover up will continue. 
The truth behind the JFK assassination will never be told by the establishment. You and I are subject to their corrupt and unjust court system, while they are above the law. 
International bankers and all of their branch organizations are at the head of this shadow government and the assassination of president Kennedy was nothing short of a coup implemented by them and their pawns in the media keep the American people from learning how their government has been overthrown by them and they have been, more or less, in complete control of the U.S. government ever since they assassinated JFK on November 22, 1963. 
 For a relatively small cadre of researchers, the Zapruder film alteration issue is moot. They have seen another film of the assassination, a better quality film. 
 These fortunate folks have seen a film which closely matches the eyewitness accounts, and is very different from the extant Zapruder film. This “other” film shows the limousine turning from Houston Street onto Elm Street; it shows the limousine coming to a full, yet brief, stop; it shows a man stepping into the street with fist raised, possibly a signal for the driver to stop; it shows two shots to JFK’s head from two directions; and it shows a shower of brain particulate violently sprayed to the left rear. 
It is important to note that none of the people who claim to have seen this film ever did so in the presence of any of the others. Nor did they view it in the same geographic location. Yet their descriptions of what they saw in the film match identically. 
For them, there is no question that the extant Zapruder film is a fabrication, part and parcel of a massive cover-up of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. There is a "real" film of Kennedy's murder that a few people have seen and it is very different that the Zapruder film the public has seen. One of those who has seen this film is Mr. Richard DellaRosa. 
 JFKresearch.com was originated by Richard J. DellaRosa. In the wake of his March 2010 death, it is maintained by his daughter and his wife -- DellaRosa was born and raised in Cleveland, Ohio and is the grandson of Italian immigrants. 
His interest in the JFK case began the day it happened and has continued ever since. -- DellaRosa spent seven years in the U.S. Air Force as a Telecommunications Systems Control Technician and operated and maintained voice and data circuits worldwide in support of the Air Force Communications Command, U.S. Air Forces Europe and the Defense Communications Agency. 
He received training at the Aerospace Technical Training Center at Keesler AFB (Biloxi) Mississippi and was subsequently stationed at MacDill AFB (Tampa) Florida, Wiesbaden Air Base (Germany) and Andrews AFB (Camp Springs) Maryland. 
 He also worked for Southern Pacific Communication Company (SPRINT) as a Senior Technician and Staff Engineer in Washington DC and later in Chicago, IL. 
Mr. DellaRosa is an honorary editor of the Assassination Research Journal for the advanced study of the death of JFK. (BELOW) is more proof positive the Zapruder film has been faked/edited: In the two top stills, they show Kennedy's limo turning onto Elm street. There are five (5) people seen from the Stemmons street sign from the lower right to the woman in a tan dress standing right next to a woman in a red top with a black skirt. 
 Now, to the (BELOW) pic, which was taken at the exact same moment..literally a split second before Kennedy was hit, from the opposite side of the street...now you see the same woman with a red top and black skirt on the far left...but she is now next to a man.....with different people beside him....
DO YOU SEE THAT? The two films don't match. When Kennedy's limo went behind the sign, is not the same as the photo taken at the exact same moment from the other side of the street (BELOW).The government conspirators didn't stop at editing the Zapruder film either. The Nix film of the assassination has been edited as well (BELOW):   (BELOW) Let's hear this fact from Orville Nix himself:
 
ENTER PHOTO EXPERT JACK WHITE:

Jack White, a longtime analyst of JFK photos and films, who presented his findings of fakery to the HSCA but which the HSCA chose to disregard. 
WHITE NOT ONLY BREAKS DOWN THE ZAPRUDER FILM MANIPULATION BUT ALSO THE BACKYARD PHOTOS OF OSWALD AS BEING FAKES!!
Marina Oswald was bullied and forced by investigators to claim she took the pictures or get deported and separated from her children. But there's no way she took the pictures and are obviously doctored composite fakes! 
Here are White's observations:**
**HERE IS THE VIDEO FROM GRAPHICS EXPERT JACK WHITE. THIS IS THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SUBJECT OF THESE PHOTOS AND IS A MUST SEE!!!!**


1) STANDING OFF CENTER:
 White concluded that Oswald is standing off center and outside the weight bearing alignment of his feet. A person could not stand in such a position.

2) PROPORTIONS: 
When the body proportions are brought into alignment from the knees to the head by adjusting the size of the photographs, one head is much larger than the other. =========3) OVERALL BODY SHADOWS: 
Although the photos were supposed to have been taken just seconds apart, the overall body shadows in the photographs are all different. In 133-A the photograph has a 10 o’clock shadow, 133-B a 12 o’clock shadow and 133-C a 10 o’clock shadow again. ============4) ARM AND ELBOWS: 
White said that the elbow is too high in one photograph and the elbow doesn’t show up on the one photograph of the arm were Oswald is holding the rifle. Attempts to duplicate this pose have been unsuccessful. ============5) HANDS AND FINGERS: 
In the photographs, the left hand and finger looks normal. Yet the right hand is missing fingernails and the hand appears too stubby to be normal. ============6) WATCH: 
The photographs reveal that Oswald is wearing a watch but all witnesses have stated that Oswald did not wear and didn’t own a watch. No watch was found among the possessions of Oswald and he was not wearing one when he was arrested. ==============7) RIFLE: 
When the photographs are blown up to the actual height of Oswald that was 5’9″, the rifle in the photograph is too long. When the rifle is adjusted in the photograph to it’s proper length, Oswald’s height is six inches too short.

8) SCOPE: 
White noted that in the photograph the rear end of the rifle scope is missing and pants wrinkles appear where the end of the scope is supposed to be, raising the prospect that the photo was retouched before being found by the Dallas police.

9) FACE: 
The face shows Oswald with a broad flat chin but Oswald’s Dallas Police mug shots depicted him with a pointed and cleft chin. There is a line that breaks up the grain of the photograph that runs across the chin that many say is where a cut took place to paste Oswald’s face onto the photograph. 
This strongly supports Oswald’s complaint to police that someone had pasted his face onto another’s body.

10) PHOTOGRAPHIC OVERLAY: 
When Mr. White took 133-A and 133-B, adjusted and overlaid them, nothing in the background or figure matched up as expected in two separate photos made moments apart with a handheld camera, as stated in the official testimony. 
However, the face of Oswald was a complete match on both photographs. This could only be explained if someone made a composite photo by pasting the same Oswald face on both pictures. =================11) FACE SHADOWS: 
Both photos show the same V-shaped shadow below the nose. However, on one of the photos Oswald’s head is tilted but the shadow does not adjust for this tilt. 
============12) NECK SHADOWS: 
On one of the photos there is light on the right side of the neck but the same photo shows the rifle casting a shadow in the opposite angle. 
======================13) COLLAR SIZE: 
The figure’s collar size can be determined from the photograph using a mathematical formula, which came out to size 16. Oswald wore a size 14-1/2 collar and all his clothes found among his personal belongings were in the 14.5 to 15-inch range. 
====================14) BACKGROUNDS: 
White determined that one photograph had the top cropped off and the other photograph had the bottom cropped off making it appear as if they were two separate pictures. However, except for small differences, the backgrounds matched on both photographs, meaning the camera never changed position which contradicts the official story of Oswald’s wife reluctantly walking into the backyard to take the photo. ======================
15) SMALL DIFFERENCES: 
For many months White was puzzled by the small differences he noted in the backgrounds as they were not off by much. After looking at the photographs some more he determined that on the background of one, the camera appeared to be slightly tilted. ===========RIFLE DIMENSIONS ARE TOO LONG COMPARED TO OSWALD'S HEIGHT 
(BELOW) Photo expert Jack White has doubts that Zapruder shot this film at all in this 11 part series:
  WHITE LEAVES NO STONE UNTURNED IN HIS ANALYSIS OF THE ZAPRUDER FILM.
HERE'S WHITE'S ENTIRE INTERVIEW ON THE FILM AND HIS PRECISE EXAMINATION:

Next, You will find this interview with Leslie Lazenby about the first two days of custody of the Zapruder film and who handled it and developed it interesting:

We will put this video of Kennedy admitting that there is a NEW WORLD ORDER CONSPIRACY on all of his assassination articles (BELOW).  

YOU'LL BE INTERESTED IN THIS VIDEO BY ABRAHAM'S GRAND DAUGHTER ALEXANDRA AS SHE TALKS ABOUT HER GRANDFATHER'S FAMOUS FILM:

NEXT: 
WHO WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD? THESE PHOTO'S PROVE HE DIDN'T KILL KENNEDY
 PREVIOUS: 
WHY WAS KENNEDY MURDERED? 

 EPH 5:11:DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE UNFRUITFUL DEEDS OF DARKNESS, BUT INSTEAD EXPOSE THEM; --

Joe Monoco Website Tracking